You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
You will learn that the ruling made by the High Court was stuck to. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.
Support:
